I hate that. Are you a normal person? Then have some middleman fees. And a bit more. And sprinkle a little on top.

Oh, you’re a hedgefund? Here you have it with minimal fees, because god forbid rich won’t grow richer asap.

They literally did name regions, USA, UK, CAnada and India

Palestine this year for example.

UK, France, Canada, New Zealand during WW I or II.

Lebanon, Ethiopia I think both this year.

Kuwait, Cyprus, in the 90s, South Korea in the 50s.

All of them?

I mean… Can Chinese people vote out the current party and pick something else?

Yes? No? No. How the fuck is it a democracy then.

No, every institution expects you to have an e-mail. Gmail is just one of the thousands upon thousands of providers.

So what. It’s like saying hunger is good because most people are hungry.

Are you of Chinese Han descent?

No? Then you will never get the citizenship. China gave fewer citizenships total than Poland does every year.

1. They are not reporting their income, but AAR apparently
2. Yes, this is a scam.

Companies are using AI in automations now and it’s working so well that they’re willing to spend tens of thousands of dollars a month (on tokens) just on that one automation

it’s working so well

Citation needed. I work in a midsized IT corpo, I don’t see it working that well? Sure, some shit is shipped faster, some is shipped slower, customers churn is 2x higher than “planned” and prod bugs have doubled.

(And we do all the fancy shit, looping, custom harnesses, orchestrations, handovers, savepoints, post delivery pipelines, autoremediation, blablabla, context, graphs blabla)

Didn’t Anthropic calculate it based on the best day and multiplying by 365?

That’s not how Lean works.

1. implementation of Lean is buggy.
2. having a Lean Theorem/Proof only proves they are connected to the axioms
3. Lean is not enough to personally verify the proof. We can see that even now with the stolen C+D Navier proof, where OpenAi paper - as we know since yesterday - is… possibly false (well, we know that the lean code does not match the paper, let the mathematicians cook).