

Jeffries is talking impeachment but voters want Nuremberg.


Jeffries is talking impeachment but voters want Nuremberg.


As long as I don’t have to solve captchas, I don’t mind.
Needing to select multiple rounds of crosswalks or busses makes me close the page.


If a newly-elected Democratic president Officially Acted on some top Republicans and Justices first, then I imagine there would be an appetite for a legislative fix to the original misruling.


I guess I’m weird but I can’t imaging not swiping. How did it not win out as the default input method?


A state government relying on a private credit bureau – one famed for being wrong all the time and leaking data like a sieve – to keep track of who can vote is… Honestly not nearly surprising as it should be.


Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.)
Editors sleeping on the job, smh.


Wake me up when courts start holding Trump officials in contempt.


Hey Guardian, the system that empowers ‘private entities’ and rewards ‘cashing in’ has a name.


Near the start of the meeting, Yen said, “I want to acknowledge myself, personally, that there was a communication failure on my part and there are many things that probably could and should have been communicated differently, and this is something that I’ll have to reflect on and improve over time. So I will do that.”
“So what does that mean going forward? Going forward, I’m still going to push,” he added.
Uh. This news makes everything about 0% better.


I’m not at all suprised he thinks that, but I dunno. I am a bit suprised he said it out loud.


Sometimes I worry that maybe the state doesn’t have our best interests in mind 👉👈
FYI, this article and the NYT article it’s referring to both seem to be a year old.