No, it’s different with hydrogen. If you want green hydrogen, you’ll waste at least 50% of energy. Then there are storage and flammability etc. We have everything we need for using hydrogen today, but somehow it is not used besides minor experiments.
No, it does does not. If it did, we’d have it everywhere.
Right, because hydrogen is not working. It’s expensive to produce but most importantly incredibly hard to store and very dangerous if it catches fire.
Yep, the big ones (MS, Google) don’t give a shit about your self hosted e-mail server and throw all of your mail to spam. They don’t do that with replies though.
They totally miss retro appeal and hobbies.
And people were not-so-long-ago concerned that phones are spying after them. Now they just send all the info themselves.
The root problem is that there is no backward compatibility - you can’t mix the two. Why is that is beyond me.
Yeah, MS lost a lot of trust with stupid things and getting that back - good luck with that. I’m gone I switched to Linux since a year (been on Windows since 3.0) or so ago and won’t ever go back even though I still need to run Visual Studio in a virtual guest.
True, if we have huge surplus of renewables, then the cost doesn’t matter that much.
As per storage. Nuclear is far less problematic to handle in many aspects. Hydrogen is notoriously hard to store and if we go at scale, there would be massive amounts of hydrogen stored everywhere. A tiny spark away of a huge bomb.