There’s a logical perspective that, if the pardons are to advance his conspiracy, the pardons would be invalid.

There’s nothing outrage can do. You’ll still buy from them since the rich own everything and you still have to eat. You can’t outlast a billionaire just on hunger alone. Billionaires own the world. We’re just the (soon to be obsolete) chattle that lives in it to increase their profits.

It does not try to help and serve the majority with well allocated resources

That’s utilitarian. Its just utilitarian in very different ways for different classes. It ultimately provides help and resources to the Epstein class.

utilitarianism suggests that it is at least in service to some sort of valued utility.

Yeah, the utility is in increasing the wealth of the rich at the expense of the poor.

It’s just stupid bullshit and corruption.

Yes, increasing the wealth of the rich at the expense of the poor is stupid corruption.

They got the shit leadership, but not the utilitarianism.

Tell that to the jobless who are being evicted from their rented homes.

extreme utilitarianism run by falliable if not biased leaders

Uh, the US already has that

No, give only us the money to replace your employees!

-Sam Altman

Dear Steam,

Please put a filter tool in so that we, the player, can choose to filter out AI slop.

Thank you.

That people are only going to be more desperate.

but we don’t call it “education insurance.”

Did you not see where I said this?

You just get a whole lot of extras for the premium you pay (like road work, disaster relief, penalizing criminality, etc.).

It will become hopium that you’ll end up sell your kids to be raped by the Epstein class because you’re so desperate for a bowl of hot soup to stave off starving to death.

Did you not see where I said this?

You just get a whole lot of extras for the premium you pay (like road work, disaster relief, penalizing criminality, etc.).

But, yeah, at a conceptual level, society is ultimately a safety net (synonym for insurance) when compared to the individualism from living pre-stone age.

AI can be run autonomously for simple tasks, but not the complex ones which are actually what costs the most.

That’s neither what its being sold as nor is it a reflection how tomorrow’s capabilities are being advertised.

A safety net is an synonym for insurance.

Well, the state is acting as a single payer for all health care its populace needs. The money is not going from you directly to the service provider. An example of that would be you paying someone to rotate your tires. Rather, the state is providing payment to the doctor for services provided to treat your health care needs. Thus, the state is acting as an insurer whose premium is the taxes you pay. You just get a whole lot of extras for the premium you pay (like road work, disaster relief, penalizing criminality, etc.). That is a textbook example of insurance.

*Edit: for those of you who doubt what I say, I ask you to look at history to as an illustration. When the US was last trying to adopt universal care under Obama, who was it that dumped the buckets of money on advertising to water it down to a mere marketplace from Romneycare? It was the private insurance companies. What was the main reform that got adopted in that in lieu of state coverage? That the insurance companies could no longer deny people with pre-existing conditions.

At least we provide our citizens with basic things like health insurance as a right.

-All Norway has to say.

Ai isn’t inherently bad. It’s just bad to have it in a society where your ability to get food, housing, and medical care are inherently attached to you having a job, which AI is marketed as replacing. Also, all the art that was stolen.

This is basically the start of the counter to automation. We still tell fables about people who stood againt the devaluation of workers like this.

De-dollarization is already happening. President Shits-his-pants is accelerating that.