Dude, the cost is the final decision point after all those concerns are handled…

*long term storage, cause batteries are good for ~24 hrs

Australia has a perfect proposal -https://www.aemo.com.au/-/media/files/major-publications/isp/2024/2024-integrated-system-plan-isp.pdf

The copies of same excel with a bit of change by different users on my sharepoint site disagrees.

In this scenario, as you said it’s not making the delivery quicker, is it right to assume that it’s making it cheaper? Is the cost of warehousing lower with robots?

You have selected which is the lesser of two evils. That doesn’t mean everyone will make the same choice, that all.

Also everyone decides who deserved to die, nothing special about “liberals” for that. (Also, are Americans liberal? I find all these political jargons confusing)

How does it help in getting more revenue then? Demand wouldn’t change, right?

USA added coal? Lol…

Well, someone once said give me freedom or give me death. So it’s up for debate I suppose.

Hong Kong on paper is, Tibet definitely was an invasion. Maybe you mean to say China assimilates?

Edit: like China is Britain of neo-colonialism and USA is France

Just tax wealth hoarding, doesn’t matter how the hoarding was achieved

To be a bit more precise, is it about throughput or lead time? Because for throughput I imagine you can just have more workers, but for quicker shipping you need to do pick and pack in less time, rather than do a lot of them in a given time.