It is NOT Utilitarian. It does not try to help and serve the majority with well allocated resources, only allows businesses to have large scale production.

Whether he is guilty or not, he is the symbol now, like it or not. Debating the semantics of it is pointless. You knew what they meant and so did we all. They are calling for murder.

I hate that this is the arguement that nuclear bros always make. It is not the same, and you know that. And if you don’t, you are not educated enough to have an opinion on this, broken glass, metal, and batteries do not give people cancer and poisoning for just standing within a few feet of them.

Yea, that’s fair. And THAT is the thing that we should be pushing and talking about, not acting like AI is brain damage.

I agree, my main issue is people treating AI as some pseudo psychological evil. It’s just an answer box. People who have issues from it already needed help. If AI didn’t make them worse, a forum site would’ve.

Yes, that is what I also said. The AI is not the issue, people not caring enough to do real practice is the issue.

Yea, if you compare the post-AI test group data with the initial control group data before they had practiced, the AI test group literally did about the same as the non AI group. And you are very correct about the fact that yoinking the easy solving tool makes skipping jump because why would you do a thing that feels pointless and is harder then it was before? I hate the enviornmental and technofascist implications of AI, but people need to stop trying to make brain degradation from AI a thing, it is never going to be a thing. You just don’t really learn from it if you don’t want to y’all, like everything else. It’s not that fucking complicated. This is just a technology witch hunt.

I am begging people to look at the ACTUAL studies and analyze the variables and results critically.

Not terribly insightful-