

The website enforces fullscreen on my phone, which would be bad on its own. But then the design isn’t responsive and you can’t really read it on a phone screen (a part of the website is off screen)
Trent: “Daria, do you ever feel like you are wasting your life?”
Daria: “Only when I’m awake”


The website enforces fullscreen on my phone, which would be bad on its own. But then the design isn’t responsive and you can’t really read it on a phone screen (a part of the website is off screen)


“I think it’s the right strategy to aggressively front-load building capacity so that way we’re prepared for the most optimistic cases,” Zuckerberg told stockholders in 2025.
And what if the results aren’t optimistic? Do these people forget there are still some things in the world they can’t will into existence?


That might be just that they’ve got so much money in Meta that they can’t afford it fail.
Edit: what I mean is that there might be gambler’s fallacy at play


Boo


Oh, yes. I am sure the original point of making this information available in the first place is following some legislation. It’s just interesting how suddenly everyone’s talking about flat butt and other tidbits, (of course they are, it’s funny) so I wonder whether that was engineered to get this kind of response. Maybe I’m just too cynical these days.


Services other people rely on


This kind of inferred information is useful for them (in some cases), of course. But I can’t help myself wondering if those more ridiculous tidbits are meant for viral marketing. They made everyone talk about Amazon (in somewhat non-negative way) again, right?
I wasn’t even planning to play it. I just wanted to check the website.
Edit: What I mean, at least put something there so people can see what it’s about and if it interests them, they can visit it again on a computer