Their point, as I read it, was more that there is no need to know that, as the company would never reach development of a product, being forever stuck trying to get everyone on the same page

Maybe in the same way Musk had, he pretended good things happened because of him, the economy was growing, stuff like that. Only needed to fick off in time

That explanation is better but for me it still lands too close to the idea of following intuition or gut feeling to determine who is good and who is bad. Which certifiably does not hold well

It also implies, that if a person is not ugly they are not thinking ugly thoughts every moment of their time. Which is false

Edit: I mean, I can see how it tries to imply that uglyness is not in the actual facial features, but it’s demonstrated in research that people treat others at face value

https://fluentslang.com/iokiyar-meaning/ says: ‘It’s Okay If You’re A Republican.’

Also, lol:

How to reply: If someone uses iokiyar in a conversation with you and you have a different political viewpoint, it’s important to approach the conversation respectfully. You can express your own perspective and engage in a constructive dialogue.

Yeah, this concept and this specific quote especially make me feel uneasy, as it implies anyone looking good and charismatic is a good person. I don’t think it generally works that way :(

that for all its flaws, actually works

Yeah, right

It’s mildly infuriating even to read about that, must be really burning to witness that :(

Depends on if you’re a robot… hey, wait a minute

So, ‘everyone I like, too’?

It is unenforceable anyway, but adding that sends some signal for sure

Unfortunately, that’s not what it postulates. Bedsides, it probably doesn’t work when all of upper positions are occupied for any foreseeable future

It depends on if 4 is left associative or right associative. We need more data

In that case you seem to have amazing endurance, I don’t know if I should express respect, condolences, or both

Yeah, afaik, pixel 10 has the same camera anyway

CPU is kinda required for all of the encryption and security to work. As for the rest, you’re probably right, although I would be glad to have a good camera on a secure phone (but won’t, at this price point, well)

I’m completely out of the loop, I wonder if that draft is based in science or hate for the corporate. Not that the hate is unfounded

WARNING: THIS PRODUCT IS HIGHLY ENGINEERED FOR RAPID FAT STORAGE. INCREASED BODY FAT ACCELERATES THE ENDOGENOUS AROMATASE PROCESS, WHICH CONVERTS TESTOSTERONE TO ESTROGEN AND MAY INDUCE PHYSICAL FEMINIZING EFFECTS

Wut? I don’t know if that cutting edge science advancement or outright stupidity. Also lavender oil aparently makes you feminine

Well, it’s their chance to prove you right or wrong

I heard, big part of those losses are the debts paid in stock, so when their stock rises the debts rise and the difference is written up as losses.

Not an economist though, so I might be completely wrong