Everyone seems to be making a conclusion that is not supported by these data. The data show that the people who identify as evangelical in 2026 vote further right than the people who identified as evangelical in 2024.

That does not mean that the cohort of people who identified as evangelical in 2024 had a rightward shift. It’s possible, and maybe even probable, but you can’t say that based on these data.

A conclusion I find more likely is that increasing numbers of people, whether through sincere religious belief or growing disbelief, no longer consider themselves “evangelical”. Those are the types of people who are more likely to be disapproving of trumpism, so essentially it’s just that the people who still consider themselves evangelical who continue to vote his agenda.

Can’t have a president MacDuff

Yes, the exact terminology in the constitution is that the president must be a “natural born citizen”. There’s debate on the “natural born” part. For example, Ted Cruz was born Canadian, but his mom was from the US, which conferred him US citizenship at birth as well, so he’s debatably “natural born”. John McCain was born in the Panama canal zone, which was a US territory at the time (and his parents were citizens), but there still was some debate at the time.

Zohran is basically just a regular immigrant who became a citizen, with no way you could claim the “natural born” part.

Because limiting voting to just one day, and in-person only, tilts in favor of people who are: 1) retired, and therefore older, and therefore more conservative on average, or 2) have more workplace freedom to leave to vote, which skews wealthy, and therefore conservative

There also are not that many trans athletes

The president of the NCAA said there were 10 out of 500,000, but that was before trans women were basically banned.

Northeast (bunker hill), east (downtown), southwest/west (allston)

I mean, technically, but that’s splitting hairs. It’s surrounded on 3 sides by Boston, and closer to downtown Boston than a lot of Boston is.

Most people in jobs like this aren’t paid hourly, they are salaried and expected to get the job done. Usually the problem isnt necessarily the runtime of an AI, but the inefficiency of a workflow that brought AI into its center.

It’s like walking a child through how to cook a meal. Maybe it’s technically less “work” since they are doing the chopping, measuring, stirring, etc, but it takes longer since you have to take time to be explicit about all your instructions, and correcting mistakes, etc. The difference is a child will eventually learn how to do it themselves, while in practice, and AI probably won’t since it likely relies on inputs that can’t just be piped in (cause if they could, you’d do the job with regular programming).

MIT and Harvard are there, which, depending on specialty, are two of the best places in the world to do math. In addition, it’s a big finance and tech town, so plenty of non-academic math to be done, too.