I need people to be reminded that Jon Ossoff opposed taxing the wealthy as recently as like 2022.

He’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing as far as I’m concerned. He’s another Jefferies. Y’all remember when Jefferies pooped his pants during a 24 hr filibuster?

Limit?

End.

I’m not a lawyer. I’m 99.99% sure that if the institution is state run (like a university of Alabama situation), then they open themselves to civil rights litigation if they were to fire you for this.

It’s the tribunal were all waiting for. Not impeachment.

Impeachment doesn’t send him to prison. A tribunal will.

Every time I see one, I roll down my window and point.

I do my part to sabotage the brand.

No one in a Tesla should feel cool.

sad tony hinchcliffe noises

deleted by creator

Yeah. They’re the red side of the coin to Maine. Same attitude but Maine wants their family. They would cede to keep the family stable.

Like if I am being ignorant and going off stereotypes: I’d bet money that there is a higher rate of alcoholism among married/divorced men in Montana than in Maine. The Montana man would keep drinking because he’d refuse to see himself as the problem. Maine man would swallow the ego if it meant saving the family. On average.

I say Maine but really, think all of New England except big cities where it’s quite a bit more liberal overall. Northern New England especially though.

Just trying to distance himself from the most unpopular part of the current admin so his presidential campaign isn’t a total joke.

Spoiler: it will be a total joke.

No that’s what I am saying. Montanians are more likely to choose their individualism over the complete family photo. That’s where their philosophy falls apart.

Yeah I respect the ethos in a lot of ways. Their philosophy only really fails when like… They disagree on stuff.

“I don’t give a fuck where your kids get educated. Just don’t tell me where to educate mine.” Is fine until “well they need to be being taught ‘x y and z.’” And you’re met with “LIKE HELL THEY DO, ASSHOLE, GET OFF MY LAWN.” because they can’t agree on x y and z.

Or

“We don’t do drugs in this house. And if my kids touch the stuff, they’re out on their own. But, why should johnny law have a say what’s in my greenhouse?”

Or

“I am fiercly pro life. But, I don’t think anyone outside this house should be telling my daughter whether or not she has access to an abortion. She’s just disowned if she ever chooses to access one.”

Where like, their rugged individualism is so fierce they’ll happily hurt people close to them to maintain their version of what’s right. Tough to respect that.

A typical Montanian view is something like

“The state shouldn’t compel the church to marry the gays. They’re a church. They should decide who they marry. But, they should be allowed a civil union. They’re just not invited to my property.”

They did that already, didn’t they?

Twice?

/s

Lmao.

Pretty sure if laws protect musk, he’ll end up far worse than if they don’t.

Got it, so you acknowledge I said nothing about Stevens, and your comment that I responded to by saying you lack reading comprehension skills was 100% justified.

Go the fuck away. Blocking you now, you obnoxious moron.

Show me what I said about Stevens.

I said

sad fetterman noises,

I said nothing about Stevens.

Yes, you are the bad reader.

Go away, you borderline crazy person.

I have said 0 things about Stevens what the actual fuck are you on about?

Please dont answer. Just go away. You’re as unpleasant as you are nonsensical.

Tagged as genuinely bad reader.

Completely bonkers that you’d turn my observation of your inconsistency into a platform for an argument.

Fetterman has endorsed republicans.

End of.

confused fetterman noises,

no u