Depends on how they see the politics, Trump being such a loser means there might be a few Rs willing to flip if they think it’ll help them. The house can file trials just based on a simple majority which dems have with a lot of wiggle.

Funny to think they care about regulations. Until they start getting jailed for it they don’t care. Even the large fines from the EU and Australia are less than they make from ignoring the regulations.

The most important is an employer willing to hire you on as an O1. The letters would need to come from experts in your field (in STEM think Nobel Laureates or society leaders). You need multiple awards from national and international organizations. Your work also needs broad recognition in at least the media of your field if not general news.

You can technically do less but they can also reject for any reason.

She also got primaried and the MI Dem party has disavowed her. So a lot better outcome than Fetterman.

Yeah, no one is saying they aren’t but these “major” losses aren’t. The top 1% of wealth owns over 50% of the market the bottom 50% owns less than 1%. To a vast majority stock losses aren’t meaningful until it affects their job. We all know theres a bubble and just hope that there can be improvements after the pop.

Its still fantasy money. Sure the effects are real but unless the system is overhauled no one here is going to do anything about it. May as well laugh otherwise you’re crying and ripping your hair out in a corner.

If you consider playing modern games a luxury yeah.

Pre-IPO investors fund the company but it isnt like they give all the money upfront. They do it in pieces and can increase or decrease as targets are reached, failed, or pivoted. This keeps the investors less likely to lose money. As debts and losses are shown the value of the company dropped and how much money is on tap for the future decreases. In this case 72B of funding was “lost”. This is paper money because they only had it on paper they didnt have the gold in hand.

Essentially their potential value to their current investors dropped 72B.

The reported net loss is real as they used more money than they made.

Neither factor is going to bankrupt or close the company considering they still have a bunch on hand and their investors still seem to think theres a possibility of profit (just less than before).

That’s my non-expert understanding anyway.

Hilarious to throw biotech out there at the end as its a similar case with a lot of smart people doing not what they want and hard to pivot out of. The filter also works similarly.