I’ll make it easier: shitcunt

That’s it, and that’s not a bad idea by the way to carry it out, because it sidesteps the ‘hardship’ problem.

It’s one of only two solutions; a shutdown which stops production.

Political suicide hahahaha

I love all these guillotines.

They aren’t doing anything about it. They’ll take it and love it like they did with that president, twice.

you non Americans

Yeah whatever. I think we know more than you think

Problem with your position is they don’t agree with you either

not a single thing I said

You sniffing Ajax again? Pretty much everything you said implied it.

you’re going to do a national shutdown

Not me, I don’t live there bright eyes, or did you forget that?

is hilarious btw

Nowhere close to your idea that they should arm and go 2A.

I don’t think that will do much

Republicans, who are Americans, prove this wrong pretty much everyone single election.

buy a gun, 2A, I want you to be armed

No sensible person, in that country or out of it, thinks that Amendment or owning a gun will be if no more use other than to perhaps personally defend themselves. It’s not their answer and never has been. One thing that is true for them; they are confined in how they can fix their problem. There are ways, but this garbage that they violently cut loose is insane. That will bring out the full force, against the public.

Hopefully, they get a fair shot at this midterm and the next presidential election, in which both the primaries and the main elections need at least an 80-85% attendance. That’s some minor hardship for some, they’ll have to tell employers they’re voting and risk jobs. There’s only one full fix with the voting path; they must replace one major party’s core people with better people in primaries, and that’s only possible with one party. That’s it, there is no other.

If they don’t, then the only other option is national peaceful shutdown of the kind that can stop most, if not all, production. Only a week of that would be enough to get the Houses moving, which is hardly enough to evict and not enough to starve. Of course, that’s a broad brush and yes, there’d be hardship. The easier way was neglected though, and this only gets harder, never easier, as the choices get narrower. The sooner the better, too.

There’s other alternatives of course, you never know what the future holds. They’re based on hope or chance, though. Things like the administration imploding.

Then I guess we have your username and subsequently, the possible dickhead factor that comes with it.

Whatever…what a stupid comment

So is our government in Australia despite pretty much everyone opposing it.

They don’t need to worry, our arsekissing government is handing the pedophiles billions. It makes me sick.

Fuck the Labor Party

They’ll get their bailout and not a thing will be done.

Yeah, I think this will be the outcome as well, though I don’t think the blue wave will be as big as many seem to believe.

You’re getting hammered, I assume by people who have their houses connected to all this shit but you’re right. Why the fuck would you let these grubs invade your privacy this much.

You know you’re shit when Trump calls you shit and the majority can’t argue with it.

Maher reflects that country as much as Trump does in his own way.

Nothing weird about it at all.

I’ll bet it’s accurate as well.

I’ll add to what Valmond said.

Not once did you advocate for a violent solution. You’re right, it’s either nothing or an extreme with these people, and excuses at every point.

They have enough to do a national peaceful shutdown. 60% in the urban areas for two weeks, which is hardly enough time to starve or be evicted, and at those numbers after it’s done, it’ll be impossible to replace that many jobs or go through with the evictions.

You’re right. Churchill was right, let them pile on…if they showed this much unity piling on the way they do to the mirror across social networks toward a national shutdown, solving their problems and voting for fucks sake, they’d solve this.

If they turned out to vote at 80-90% all the time, there’d be daylight between them and the current best performing democracies in the world.

Gotcha sorry

Well I didn’t say it could do it okay

I don’t like it anywhere, but socials are for people. We expect AI on data search.

Neither do I to be honest

Possibly, but socials are for people connecting, or they’re supposed to be. So people don’t want AI crawling through their socials.

It’s one thing to get a summary on a search, just plain annoying to have a post summarised.