Woah. That has me trippin. How did he think of that?

That household is a hotspot of geniuses.

It’s also going to make that porn more popular. Media bans don’t actually work because of how media demand works. Supply and demand don’t naturally coordinate for media exchange, except by apply risk to non-paying recipients of media. That’s how copyright works. If you apply risk to non-paying recipients for a different reason, economics doesn’t care about your reason. Just that you applied risk. Risk applied to paying parties goes into a different part of the formula. The result is total demand goes up (cash changing hand motivating production), but it becomes sold as a contraban.

D = CV*min(1,FR/FV)-CR, F(free) V(value) R(risk) C(commercial)

Because these are all distributions. Subtracting the CR distribution from that more complex part never gives you a zero distribution. But if FR is uniformly zero, demand goes to zero. Once you introduce FR you open the window of coordination (modifier of CV) to be non-zero. Because copyright enforcement is lax for pornography, FR is basically zero now. But it’s about to not be.

It’s the same reason commercial production of CSAM increases.

Ok, bye.

Ignore the self described Michael Bloomberg media empire.

Or don’t. Work sucks.

to sum up:

Machiavelli right. Political institutions don’t serve people.

BS. The commander in chief can pull out of any war without congressional support.

And tell me why I went into the election 100% ready to vote democrat to punish republicans for supporting zionism, but in one race the republican said he would cut support and has a voting record to back it, and in the other race the democrat was a zionist as well and there was an independent who had no problem stating the real facts.

I went in ready to vote straight ticket democrat and after research ended up voting for none.

Or Michael Bloomberg creating an entire “news” outlet to push people to vote his position year round.