

It means that any further harassment can be effectively ignored.
While I still believe there are a lot of people that need to be jailed, this is not an instance where that was the intent behind the ruling.


It means that any further harassment can be effectively ignored.
While I still believe there are a lot of people that need to be jailed, this is not an instance where that was the intent behind the ruling.


Yep, just riffing on the way the headline reads.


Hahahah, sorry, just riffing on the headline.


I think that was the intent. But the first time I read it, I was very confused.


Ah yes, my lawyer. That I, a regular working guy, have. On retainer. Contact reads: “my lawyer” in my phone.
I have a shortcut to call them from my home screen…


You could call anything a “duh” with that argument…
I will say, I’ve taken a TON of basic cyber security corporate run training events… NONE of them talk about using ad block hahahahah.


A lot of “duh” comments indicating people didn’t read… The headline could be better too but it doesn’t excuse commenting without even engaging the post…
Also, even if it was what people think it is, it’s important to have evidence and journalism highlighting that evidence.


I don’t feel like this article is doing that?


This is pointless hyperbole. If anyone has been reading the news, yes he’s trying. But also failing.
Anyone have any sources showing anything this admin has done to successfully subvert any states election process?


Before SpaceX it was the ULA doing ALL launches. This is nothing new. Launch is expensive, and no one wants to pay the barrier to entry.
Press charges? The court already ruled that won’t fly.
They can TRY. It won’t mean anything…
They may continue to harass. They probably will. But it’ll be empty.