• thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Valve does not abuse their market leader position. Being a market leader and a monopoly is a total different position.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Market share is the only thing defining a monopoly.

      Absolute monopolies basically do not exist, except as subcategories of de facto monopolies. Even Apple obviously does not monopolize smartphones.

      What would anti-competitive practices even mean, if there were no competitors?

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        There is no marketshare PC game launchers. What even does that mean? The most successfull games are not even on Steam, most played games are LoL, Roblox, Fortnite, Minecraft and besides that, there are plenty of alternative shops every user can freely choose from. Nobody is forced to use Steam, its an open platform. Every single game they buy can be purchased on any of these platforms. You don’t even need to buy games on Steam, to buy Steam game keys.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly:

        A monopoly (from Greek μόνος, mónos, ‘single, alone’ and πωλεῖν, pōleîn, ‘to sell’) is a market in which one person or company is the only supplier of a particular good or service.[1] A monopoly is characterized by a lack of economic competition to produce a particular thing, a lack of viable substitute goods, and the possibility of a high monopoly price well above the seller’s marginal cost that leads to a high monopoly profit.

        Therefore Steam is not a true monopoly. They just have a huge market leader position.