

i think it’s dangerous to say that something shouldn’t happen, but if it happened it was a good thing. c.f. appeasement
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and thriv.social, now on dbzer0 or piefed.social


i think it’s dangerous to say that something shouldn’t happen, but if it happened it was a good thing. c.f. appeasement


oftentimes concern can drastically under- or over- state reality, which is why ze’s asking this to measure reality


why not give those who buy the game a copy of the source code?


WIRED says it’s stock Android.
“Stock Android” is pretty well-defined. what do you think it means?


this doesn’t really present the logic though? if i were a tubthunping politicker i would easily reply “they already were elected through the open process of the democratic caucus leadership election”. i don’t see a replacement for this two-century–old practice coming any time sooner than proportional representation


TL;DR: a stock Android option is available where you still can sideload
that’s only if you choose the “anti-distraction” OS where nearly no apps are available. stock android is also an option (on which sideloading is still very much possible but harder with a waiting period after the restrictions you’ve probably heard of).
i think this feature of the anti-distraction OS is probably a misstep if it can’t be overridden, but you do not have to use the anti-distraction OS at all.
Edit: Added TL;DR


deleted by creator


I do not believe SearXNG has any peer-to-peer components.


it is possible to make the school wifi apply google restrictions on google websites


what makes what the article describes slop?


“model” means “mode”, not LLM here:
He therefore hopes that the unusually large number of commits “is a sign that the AI fixes are becoming more part of the ‘normal development’ than a flood of fixes that go into the whole stabilization phase."
“I think that’s a much healthier model,” he added, before hedging with the observation that “people are expecting 7.4 to be the next LTS [long-term support] release, which is another independent reason why some releases tend larger than others.”
people now able to humanize those they do not understand
almost:
part of the point of the classification is that neurodivergent individuals often have depressive or anxiety disorders only as a result of pressure from neuronormative society to fit in, and that care should focus on being resilient against such pressure instead of trying to eliminate the neurodivergence, e.g. trying to “cure autism”. things like depression and anxiety are not considered neurodiversity in themselves and are in fact what should be treated.
the inclusion of personality disorders is controversial (partly for similar reasons), but the inclusion of schizophrenia is unchallenged.