Didn’t say “good with it”, I said "being good*.

5 years ago the complaint was people copy pasting from stack overflow without care. Those people now push without care.

If they push shit, I push back. It’s a tool they can use, not an excuse. Creating rules for the agent is fine, but that’s only a soft guardrail.

We don’t have a mandate to use LLMs, if things are worse with them then we won’t use them.

Way too many people just equate any form of LLM/agentic/AI with pure slop.

As a tech lead who has to review a lot of code: those who did shit without LLM do shit with it. Those who are good without, are good with it.

Because they were designed with cloud first mentality, they are fetching the temperature 100 times per second to the server. In case of connection issues, they stop working.

Does this seen stupid? Yes. Did I make it up? Also yes. Is the true for a lot of consumer electronics? Yes.

They were able to recover a lot, so 3B is what they cannot recover.

It’s easier to revert a fraudulent bank movement than a crypto one.

Wait, why did you block your daughter on your free Navidrome?

Every time somebody says Microsoft is now shit because of AI, I have to remind them windows has been human slop since Vista.

And verifying 10 pounds of incoherent architectural choices and over engineered submodules of human work is certainly harder than reviewing tee bits of coherent agent work.

You are? I can also make false dichotomy fallacies!

There’s a nuance. Bot activity dropped, and everybody basically accepts that. The issue is that most of it is crawlers, and the disagreement comes into how many were social “influencers”. Those tend to pretend to be human, so it’s harder to measure directly.

No, I read the text. No AI/machine concluded the drop, and you can read that on the site itself. The quantity of messages classified as pro Russian aggression dropped. That classification is a very mature technology. You said AI only to sew distrust. If the article claimed checked manually you would claim bias. This is seagulling. “I am just saying…(while willingly skipping reality)”

And you are willingly affiliated with a tankie instance, no assumption there. I don’t know it you’re a tankie, and I haven’t said you’re, but brown and in the toilet tends to be shit and not chocolate.

The AI didn’t draw the conclusions, and modern AI isn’t even needed. I’ve used NN a decade ago for similar results, it’s fairly simple with a good training set.

I discredit those willingly associated with fascists, as well as those willingly associated with tankies (different flavor of the same shit). But in this case, the extension wasn’t needed, just a reminder I need to update my ban list.

Curious to know how you can claim AI usage. I would suspect you’re just trying low effort discredit, but seeing the ml there’s no need to suspect.

I blame the one who should have set the backups. Even if it was deleted by a malicious actor, they there’s no excuse to not have backups

The ones who don’t believe this can?

I added it to ask the LLM.