

Ah yes, another “leftist” who takes time to shit on the USSR for no reason and who believes the US and Russia are somehow in the same ballpark as imperialists.
Saying that Russia “may not have the influence [of] the US” and then judging both states exactly the same is wild.
Critical support for Russia. America will fall.




I am struggling to understand the point of referring to DPRK leadership as non-dynastic despite the obvious lineage. Your point that it is transitioning is noted, but is there some other historically-accurate term for transitory dynasties under socialism? Or is it your understanding that the state was never dynastic in the first place and the lineage has been mischaracterized?
Is there a book you can recommend with perspective on the issue of dynasty in DPRK?