Palworld
creative
deleted by creator
“I don’t think having a publisher or investor automatically makes a studio any less indie,”
“Indie” has become a marketing term.
Capitalism ruins everything
This just mirrors what’s been happening with “Indie” music and films for decades already. I don’t think it’s even remotely new in the gaming space either. Indie is more of a genre or even just a vibe than anything else.
Most people think being an indie developer and game means a certain look of the game and the budget they had to work with. I discussed this over and over again. People don’t know what indie means! Publisher and investor takes the independent status away. The company or team is no longer an indie studio. Self publishing is indie, regardless of how much money and time and people the game required to make.
Stardew Valley is an indie game with a publisher. It is not about publishing.
How is it independent, if its no longer independent? Edit: Note, I’m not playing mind games here. This is a serious question. Maybe I misunderstand something here.
If you write a book and go to a publisher to print it, that’s independence. You wrote the book on entirely your own terms
If the publisher pays up front for a book, or pays you to edit a book to their standards, that’s not independent
Yeah, as the other comment explained this to me, I think I understand this now and agree on it. As long as the project was not funded and supported during the development, the game stays independent. I also consider in such case Baldur’s Gate 3 to be independent (which some people disagree).
Well, I respect the honest desire to learn and I’m glad you understood the subtly that full creative freedom makes something “spiritually indie”
Have a good one
Thanks for the patience to explain. The example with the book was quiet illustrative and simple to understand as well.
Independently developed but not independently published.
From there it just depends on if you personally consider that still being “indie” by your definition.
Does “indie” for you mean “a studio which independently develops games” or does it mean “a studio that does everything independently”
I think this is a good an important distinction.
It also depends on the publisher’s involvement. There are many publishers that actually contribute to development by providing resources, including art and design recommendations or contractors
Did the CEO work on the game directly if yes then you are indie if not you are not. Also doesn’t count if you have a parent company. That is my option is a good test of indie.
Curious if you guys would consider Remedy Indie? They are independent, self published, and dont have any owning interests…
Unfortunately people conflate single-A games with indie games. (Probably because most indie games are also single-A games)
Remedy is definitely indie, but I’d consider them an AA studio
I think the weirder question to ask is how much publisher/investor pressure should there be for a game to no longer be considered indie. Because it seems to be that there’s many publishers that exert little to no control over a game’s contents, especially if the publisher is itself an indie game studio. For a while, as well, Microsoft seemed to have not applied any editorial pressure to any of the studios that they bought. So would these games (eg Ori) still be considered indie?
Yea, good example of that is Dwarf Fortress, which has an indie publsiher (kitfox)
