i am more than willing to engage on any positive claim you want to make (i probably agree with a lot of them). what i’m not willing to do is tolerate personal attacks and dogpiling.

I’ve donated my time. I’ve knocked on doors. I’ve gathered signatures. I’ve phone banked. I’ve given my votes. the worst thing that can happen is they win. I get stabbed in the back every time.

volunteering on a campaign isn’t laudable. it’s for suckers.

demanding people be paid for their work is the most communist position

volunteering for politicians

the campaigns get money. make them pay.

this headline is drivel

disrupting oil extraction projects is probably more effective

siphons votes

she earns votes. she doesn’t siphon them.

there was a senate investigation that found that there was no evidence she took any money from russia. she speaks out against russia and republicans.

this “research” itself relies almost entirely on poore-nemecek 2018, which suffers from major flaws. it combines disparately methodized lca studies, which is explicitly against the guidance for lca studies.

more importantly, that study does not find that the environment has improved.

first, the paper does not make such a claim. that’s fluff provided by one of the authors. second, that paper has dubious methodology, so even its conclusions should not be trusted.

edit:

You’re welcome to review and refute the science

… but if you do, I’ll just downvote instead of dealing with the fact that the evidence is insufficient.

Not eating meat is probably the biggest impact you can have

I doubt it

plenty of people have tried that. the environment gets worse

Voting is Not Harm Reduction - An Indigenous Perspective

I think it is harmful for them to advertise as e2ee email because people who don’t understand email or encryption will think their email is encrypted when it very much is not

neither of them is e2ee when emailing anyone outside their ecosystem.