“Yeah, absolutely, it would be troubling if my caucus elects someone like Van Hollen that has really made his name being very anti … hostile to Israel,” Fetterman said when asked if there is a “red line” for him to walk away from the party, in a Fox News interview.
Feeterman over here endorsing Van Hollen
Two more years of this guy…
John Fetterman says
ima stop ya right there
If that isn’t an endorsement of Van Hollen then I don’t know what is.
At this point Fetterman is just fishing for an excuse to switch sides because he knows he has no leverage now. Just giving do it and stop being a disingenuous shit.
John Fetterman still being able to breathe air is much more troubling. His existence harms everyone.
If Fetterman opposes it, that means it’s the correct move. I guarantee if the Senate had ended 51/49 Democrats he would have officially switched his party affiliation, (further) betraying the people he’s supposed to represent. Go choke on your AIPAC/UDP money…
If he is against it, Van Hollen must be the right choice.
John Fetterman says…
Just leave man.
Fetterman lost the right to his opinion.
Shut up, John.
This guy so very much hoped he’d be the center of attention if it was close to a tie in the Senate. Now no one can give a fuck what he thinks.
Thank you, I read this and was like, sorry can you remind me who gaf? He’s going to vote Republican and we all knew that. Old news.
Well, if he sticks around and votes at least 80% of the time with Democrats, fine. But no one has to really mind him much when he’s being a little priss about Israel or whatever.
Federman is just 3 Kyrsten Sinemas in a trench coat.
he did a business
So it’s the right call then. Fetterman can fuck right off with his irrelevant cowardly whore ass.
Israel: Representation without taxation
It be hostile to also vote in a Democrat and get a GOP surprise.
