• obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m very concerned about this.

    But I’m even more concerned that the jobs that AI kills are jobs that no one gets trained to do, and that no one will know how to do them when the computers stop working.

    • TeaWithDani@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Ai isn’t even close to replacing a job yet. Its not even cheaper than a human. Anyone going into a field that people are fleeing due to Ai will be in huge demand when we move on to the next scam cycle.

      Tech layoffs in the last few years arent jobs being replaced with Ai, they are from the massive amounts of overhiring that occured in 2020-2021

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    AI’s business model is starting to look like a snake eating its own tail: scrape human work, replace the humans who make it, flood the web with synthetic sludge, then wonder why there’s less quality data to train on. Silicon Valley calls it disruption. Everyone else might call it burning the furniture to heat the house.

    • TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      I cant recall the source (I think it was a Telegraph article) but it only took current AIs 7 “rounds” to confuse its data amongst each other and it was 11 or 12 before it becomes completely corrupted. The testers basically used ChatGPT, Grok etc etc to search each other and they just had massive brain farts at the 7th round of questioning.

  • TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    When AI removes the need for so many jobs and people can’t afford purchases and the economy collapses (again), how will the world’s governments act? I can’t see the US ever introducing universal basic income and the vast majority of countries simply can’t afford it. I think AI might be one of those moments where it seemed like a great idea in the zeitgeist, but in retrospect, they just didnt plan for it, because all they wanted to do was just make as much money as possible. The current crop of James Bond baddies at the top of the ladder are happy to see the world burn, because they won’t be around to give a shit when it all comes crashing down.

    • Freeposity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      I can’t see the US ever introducing universal basic income

      Recent polling shows 66% of Americans support Medicare for all. The people will demand UBI once it’s needed, the only question is whether the Epstein class will comply peacefully or not.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      The US debt is so high now that a UBI would push it over the edge most likely without massive tax increases. Decades of being told all taxes on anyone are evil probably mean people would walk off a cliff before doing that.

            • Freeposity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              In Douglas Rushkoff’s “Survival of the Richest”, originally published on Medium on July 5, 2018, with the subtitle “The wealthy are plotting to leave us behind.”, Rushkoff describes accepting an unusually well-paid invitation to speak about “the future of technology” at a luxurious private resort. He expected roughly 100 investment bankers, but instead found himself sitting at a table with five extremely wealthy men from the hedge-fund world. Their questions shifted from cryptocurrency to whether New Zealand or Alaska would be safer during a collapse—and then to their bunkers.

              A brokerage-house CEO who had nearly finished building an underground bunker asked, “How do I maintain authority over my security force after the event?”

              By “the event,” they meant a catastrophe such as environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear disaster, or an unstoppable virus. They worried that money would become worthless and their armed guards might take over. Rushkoff recounts them discussing combination locks on food supplies, disciplinary collars for guards, and robot security. His response was to treat their security personnel well and build relationships rather than rely on coercion.

              They didn’t like that answer.

              https://archive.rushkoff.com/articles/1094-survival-of-the-richest.html https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/sep/04/super-rich-prepper-bunkers-apocalypse-survival-richest-rushkoff

              • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                No billionaire wants to live in a bunker for the rest of their life. They want adulation, people fawning over them, etc. They’d also need to continue to receive supplies, fresh food (you think they are going to put up with dried rations?), hookers, travel, etc. If they are cut off they will be no better than Hitler in his bunker.

                History has shown when the leadership is corrupt everyone around them follows suit. Stealing whenever they can, abandoning their posts at the first chance, incompetence, security goes to whoever pays them the most, etc.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh yeah, the AI companies realized this from the start, maybe not that it would happen this quickly, but that it would happen.

    This is why they are hyping AI up further now, as they want to squeeze the final drop of blood from the stone.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Businesses destroying the skills development pipeline by eliminating entry level jobs.

    Retail is so polluted with AI scams and deceptive ads that the public is being driven off of any but the most well vetted sites. This is on top of the massive scams problem worldwide.

  • ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The closer you look, the more you see doom loops everywhere. Journalists, for example, used to publish work under the assumption that online platforms would drive readership to them. But now, tools like ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini simply summarize their articles without sending readers to their sites, sparking a crisis that seems poised to wipe out the independent media.

    Do people just read summaries?

    What are people so busy doing these days?

    Also that’s not true for me, when ai summarises something or gives me stats I usually click on the links to read more

    • brackled@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      You underestimate how many people have just forgone the usage of search engines. Most people these days just go to their preferred AI site or app and just take at face value whatever slop it spits out. No one reads or verifies anymore. It would be something if they were using that “saved time” on something productive but alas it’s just to go back to doom scrolling or something else just as meaningless. It’s depressing :/