“We’re seeing a war against trans individuals being waged by our federal government, and we, as citizens, need to be willing to step up and say this is not OK,” Kluwe said. “The Democratic Party has taken a very defensive posture on trans issues when that’s the absolute wrong thing to do. You don’t make a bully go away by cowering in the corner and say, I’ll agree with you on these little things. That just encourages the bully.
“We need to be full-throated in the attack, saying these are people who pay taxes, who serve in our military, and who are entitled to the exact same rights that every single other American is entitled to, which includes health care and the opportunity to live a prosperous life. We can’t be afraid of the right-wing fear machine. We have to take it to them, show that we’re willing to fight.”
Citation needed.
Citation needed
No citation needed, because obviously claiming that there’s no point fighting for the rights of people who exercise their right to dissent and express grievances is fucking batshit crazy! 🤦🏻
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/09/coward-democrat-confronted-by-angry-constituents-for-opposing-trans-equality/
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/09/coward-democrat-confronted-by-angry-constituents-for-opposing-trans-equality/
https://www.kqed.org/news/12101538/newsom-signs-new-protections-for-lgbtq-reproductive-rights
https://www.npr.org/2024/07/16/nx-s1-5041437/california-bans-school-rules-requiring-parents-notification-of-childs-pronoun-change
I’m sure there’s others, and I’m sure they’re not good enough for you. Which I argue is the problem.
My point is these people ARE fighting for trans rights. But when they say anything at all that goes against what the community wants, all of a sudden none of that means anything anymore.
Nothing about banning trans people from sports is reasonable…
Nobody is banning trans people from sports. That’s not even a discussion.
Yes they are. Trans athletes are banned from playing on their teams.
That’s a much more specific statement than you’re other one, and you know it. You intentionally misrepresent what is being proposed to make it sound worse.
They’re not being banned from sports. They’re being told which team they’re allowed to join. It’s significantly different.
Yeah, they’re not banned from participating in sports, they’re just banned from participating together with their peers, essentially forcing them to deny their identity to participate. Not much of a choice, that.
And that’s not even going into the fact that trans women statistically are more at risk for sexual assault than any other demographic (yes, even moreso than cis women) and male athletes are amongst the most frequent sex offenders.
So yeah, not so fucking reasonable!
Adding nuance is great, as it helps identify the actual issues and discussion actual solutions.
But do you see how saying “Trans people are being banned from sports” is an intentionally manipulative way representing the issue? I see stuff like this all the time on here, and it gets tiring.
I’ll be honest, I see manipulative language in your comment as well.
Male/female sports isn’t about “playing with your peers”. Also, there’s a further nuance that NOBODY discusses, and that’s the difference between competitive levels. Schools have varsity vs jv. There’s travel leagues vs Rec leagues. Trans people should have the opportunity to play with their peers, but that doesn’t mean it has to include every level of competition.
"Essentially” is doing some very heavy lifting in this sentence because nothing else about that sentence is true.
Is this bad? Yeah! Should something be done about this? Of course!
But you bring it up to make it sound like this is a result of trans women not being allowed to play women sports. This is incredibly manipulative.
I could go on with other comments I have seen on here.
No it’s not. “You’re banned unless you deny your identity and put yourself at risk” takes more words and means essentially the same thing.
When there’s no reasonable alternative from being banned, you’re effectively banned.
The hell it isn’t! The social aspects are a HUGE part of any team sport. The sense of belonging is a huge part of why children want to do it in the first place.
Membership of the team and the associated belonging being contingent on pretending to be something they’re not is a surefire way to life long identity and self acceptance issues BEYOND what gender dysphoria already brings.
It’s abuse, if not literally a form of torture.
Because none of the bans differentiate between those. It’s not “no trans girls in elite sports but junior varsity is ok”.
Pretending otherwise isn’t adding “nuance”, it’s needlessly pretending that a very clear line is smudged.
So what, they’re to be allowed to participate, but if they’re too good, they’re going to be held back with kids of lesser prowess and/or zeal?
Or do you mean the other way around? ONLY the trans athletes who are better than most cis athletes should be allowed to play?
Either way, that’s bigoted, no matter how much you pretend that it isn’t.
So you’re saying that trans girls participating on the boys’ team would NOT be denying their identity? In what fucking world?
No, I make it sound like forcing trans girls into locker rooms with male athletes puts them at higher risk of being sexually or otherwise assaulted than they otherwise would be.
And the reason why I “make it sound like that” is because it IS like that.
If anything, what’s manipulative is you trying so hard to mask your bigotry behind what you think sounds like reasonable concerns when it’s everything but
I bet you could. Lemmy tends not to be a safe space for concern trolling and transphobia.