Not only did the billionaire tax fail in California, but prop 42, to amend the California constitution to forbid the introduction of taxes on personal property (investment accounts, art) for the wealthy in the future, backed by greaseball Gavin Newsom, seems to have passed.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Americans voted to protect their personal finances, they didn’t become socialist overnight. The moment the economy settles they will go back to voting Republican.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We have homeless encampments everywhere. No one equates that to the wealthy making it expensive to live here for their own profits bcz they have money to invest.

  • tacoplease@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Personally, I think this should be a federal tax, not just a California or state tax so that there’s nowhere for the roaches to hide.

      • tacoplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        They’ll just move to a state that won’t. I’m sure they’ve got million retainers with lawyers who are working in this already.

        • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Some will, but many won’t, granted they leave behind a lot of infrastructure, routes anf other facets of how they became so wealthy

  • kreskin@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is a pretty notable exception to the blue wave. Newsom seems to be setting himself up as a centrist/independent/republican-lite runner for the presidency-- hoping to siphon off republican voters to his campaign for all the Democrats he loses in the process. This very seldom works. Its always a hail mary and pisses off the Democratic party base.

      • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Dems have a habit of screwing over progressive candidates and it’s likely that Newsom is going to be the establishment nominee. Plus Dems have a free walk to up the presidency due to Trump’s corruption and betrayals. I could see a President Newsom and Trump sees that too, which is why he takes so many digs at him.

        • mrmisses@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          A protector of billionaires doesn’t work for me any more than the protector of pedophiles. We need an AOC

          • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I’m not advocating for either as much as I’m diagnosing the present party structure and the process by which the democrats choose presidential candidates.

            The democrats control who wins the primary through delegates and can coordinate who drops out to prop up their chosen candidate. That’s how we got Biden. Unless structure of the primary changes, there’s no way to create a fair process that a progressive candidate can win.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It hasn’t worked yet.

      The only candidates that can siphon Republican votes are other Republicans.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Arguably it did. But nearly before many here were born or politically aware. Bill Clinton did it. Then Democrats spent the next 30 years trying to normalize it.

        • SippyCup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Bill Clinton won because Ross Perot split the Republican ballot. He only received 43% of the popular vote.

  • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    California is its own beast.

    Peoples lives have not really been getting better because of federal politics, but moreso Newsom shutting the door on progressive legislation.

    Blue voters haven’t had a strong urgency to show up since the state is already blue, so people feel that showing up to vote has less impact. Big tech companies are spending millions on ads to confuse voters. Many of the measures also were seemingly written in a confusing way.

    What doesn’t get mentioned more is culturally it feels like people have been fending more for themselves with all these cost of living increases. People drive and act selfishly constantly. There’s a noticeable difference in the way people from SoCal or NorCal are living compared to say Oregon or Washington. I would say people I’ve interacted with living in the later two seem much happier on average compared to the slog of the freeway ‘go, go, go’ atmosphere plaguing California.

    I think the national wave of blue will do a lot of good for reminding Californians that there is hope out there. Plus, the new governor may be a bit more likely than Newsom to let some progressive legislation pass.

    So many people feel hopeless in California right now. The prospects of owning a home, starting a family, and/or retiring becomes less possible by the day even if you have a good job as a young person. People still are voting, but without the progressive policies that are desperately needed it’s becoming tough. Hopefully we see progressive federal policies make it through since that could do a lot of good at making life better for Californians.

    Also, California desperately needs a Mamdani style person to come to light. Someone that can motivate sweeping progressive changes through passion and care.

  • MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wouldn’t trust this yet, only 62% of estimated votes have been counted so far.

    I checked the results 24 and 12 hours ago, and it was then at 60% and 61% respectively. Each time I’ve checked, the gap has been closed by 0.6%.

  • Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why would 42 prohibit future wealth taxes? We just need an initiative that changes that back, right? Could that and the tax be all in one initiative or does it need to be split up.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Prop 42.

    That bill was specific about savings, retirement, and assets. For anyone.

    Of course voters wouldn’t want that to be taxed.

    It includes things that should not be taxed.

    It specifically added items that apply to the average person and they don’t want themselves taxed. It was a sleazy way to get people to vote to protect billionaires from additional taxes.