• DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Honestly we need her in the Senate for at least two terms before she’s president, once she’s served her terms as president she’ll be stuck as powerless as Obama probably feels rn, let’s milk having someone like her for as long as possible, and that starts with her taking that feckless shit head Schumer’s Senate seat.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      poor aoc, great leadership qualities but when she had a chance to ditch the dsa she doubled down on the commie cesspit

      maybe by the time she does run the mamdani feedback loop will have turfed out the commie mystics

    • TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I get what you’re saying but she’ll do much more good as President than sitting in Congress.

      Trump showed just how much power the office has, for someone willing to wield it.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fuck everything about this; strike while the iron is hot or be ruled by pedofascists forever. You won’t get another chance. You do not realize the danger we are all in.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a symbolic run to shift the Overton window in the right direction and to take some of the lightning off some more moderate candidate, who will look less radical next to her.

      • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s so ridiculous saying moderate candidate would look less radical next to her, there is nothing radical about AOC, Bernie, El-Sayid, Mamdani, yet here you are carrying the enemy’s water and showing how biased they made you by describing them as radical, when you don’t have to at all.

        I get what your saying is meaning the voters, but my point is how is making sure people have healthcare, quality education, clean air & water, radical? The rich have done such a masterful job brainwashing the shit out of our society over the centuries of disinformation and religious indoctrination.

        • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Dude please give it a rest. We’re talking about how candidates are perceived in the general election. You know this is full of distortions, double standards, lies, and many dated associations.

          Giving me shit for calling clean air radical only shows you don’t know how to have a meta conversation about political discourse itself and are on a hair-trigger to give speeches at any provocation.